Sunday 20 June 2021

Newest Boeing 737 MAX First Test Flight

 New Boeing 737 MAX lifts for first time

After the grounding of the fleet of Boeing 737 MAX, the fleet is ready to rule the skies again. The fleet was grounded after the deadly crashes of the highly modern and advanced aircraft "Boeing 737 MAX".
The new sensors added in the aircraft which made the Boeing 737 much advanced had a serious glitch in the system. In both the cases the jet's computer triggered a system that made the pilots to struggle with the control systems, which eventually took the aircraft into a steep nose dive to plumit the craft from the sky. The Lion Air flight JT610 and the Ethiopian Airlines flight ET302 killed approximately 346 people, in October 2018 and March 2019.
After making the some technical changes in the flight computer the Boeing 737 MAX is ready to leave the tarmac after a long interval.



The Boeing confirmed that the first flight of the Boeing 737 MAX 10 tookoff from Renton, Washington at 1707 GMT into the clear sky. Flying over the central part of the state and conducted a safe landing after two and half hours later in the airport of Seattle.

On the controls was Captain Jennifer Henderson, after completing the flight successfully he said "The aircraft performed very beautifully. The profile we flew allowed us to test the airplane's various vital flight control systems, flight control and handling qualities, all of which checked out exactly as we expected". 

Initially this test flight was to be conducted in 2020, but the 737MAX was grounded for another 20 months due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.


Going by the projections made by the Boeing, they intend to commence the deliveries of the 737-MAX10 in 2023. Before starting of the deliveries Boeing will conduct a series of test flight to make the jet safe for the passengers and the crew. The tests conducting by the US FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION(FAA).

In an official statement the president and CEO of Boeing Commercial Airplanes said that the 737-10 is a very important part of the the fleet of their various customers. The Boeing 737MAX-10 will give them more capacity, great fuel efficiency and the best ever per seat economy of any single-aisle airplane currently in the skies.

The jet was initially announced at the Paris Air Show in June 2017, where the company officials talked about its size and termed it as the most efficient, profitable single aisle airplane in the industry. The jet was competing with the Boeing's rival Airbus' Airbus A321neo. The Boeing 737MAX-10 has a capacity of 230 passengers. The company has been increasing the seating capacity of the 737MAX series from 737MAX-7 which had about 138-153 seats. 


This will be a short range jet as compared to the other 737MAX versions. It will be propelled by some of the Boeing's finest Leap-1B jet engine, designed by the GE Aviation and Safran Aircraft. 

So, now after the jet has the approval of the US regulatory bodies and also from the various other major civil aviation bodies. The approval was granted in November 2020, and since then Boeing has started new deliveries of the max and has also announced new contracts with several other leading carriers.

For more aviation related news and stories stay tuned to AVIATION BOY.
    

 

Wednesday 16 June 2021

ALL ABOUT BOEING

 GROWTH OF THE BOEING

From being just a beginner in the industry to the rulers of the sky BOEING have covered a significant amount of path.


Lets take a glimpse of the Journey of BOEING



1916: William Boeing starts the Pacific Aero merchandise Co., that was renamed when its founder a year later. Boeing's 1st planes, the Model C picket seaplanes, were sold to the United States Navy for warfare I, establishing a key alliance with the United States military.

1927: Boeing creates its own airline, Boeing transport, for transporting mail with its Model 40 biplanes. The model would become the primary Boeing aeroplane to hold passengers.

1934: Boeing, suspect of noncompetitive practices, is forced to interrupt up into 3 entities: United Technologies, United Airlines and Boeing. Founder William Boeing divests his holdings within the company.

1937: Boeing delivers the primary B-17s to the United States Army air force, the enormous "Flying Fortress" bomber that contend a central role within the Allied triumph in warfare II.

1941: British Royal Air Force takes delivery of B-17s, giving them their initial style of combat.

1954: the huge jet-powered B-52 Stratofortress becomes the United States military's symbol of power within the conflict, to carry a key place within the United States Air Force up through these days.

1958: Pan Am, the leading United States airline, unveils the Boeing 707, that shortly became the primary commercially prosperous jet airplane. tv ads showed well-to-do passengers sipping wine and enjoying vibration-free travel, a symbol of the post-war United States economic boom.

1962: Boeing introduces the CH-47 Chinook chopper, employed in movement and battleground resupply conspicuously within the Vietnam War.

1969: The Boeing-built Saturn V rocket propels spaceman Neil Armstrong to the moon.

1970: The four hundred traveler 747 jumbo Jet, quite doubly as giant because the 707, is launched to dominate international aviation and freight over subsequent decades.

1970: Boeing archrival Airbus is formed originally as a joint effort of the German and French governments.

1977: 2 747s collide on the runway of the Canaries, killing 583 passengers within the deadliest plane crash in history. The accident sparked sweeping upgrades to international safety laws.

1987: Boeing is additional to the Dow Jones Industrial Average, the celebrated index of blue chip corporations.

1997: Boeing acquires American archrival McDonnell Douglas for $13.3 billion, slimming the sector of major industrial craft manufacturers to simply 2, Boeing and Airbus, and beefing up its capability as a global weapons maker.

2001: Boeing picks Chicago as its new company headquarters when the western city offers up some $60 million in tax incentives to maneuver from Seattle, the company's production base.

2011: when various delays, Boeing's newest passenger jet, the widebody Dreamliner, completes its 1st industrial flight from Narita, Japan to Hong Kong. The planes, famed for fuel potency, were later grounded because of AN heating drawback with the lithium-ion batteries.


General Specifications of Boeing Crafts 

Over the years Boeing have manufactured numerous number of commercial jets and aircrafts for military. Some aircrafts with their specifications can be seen below:

Boeing 737 MAX-8:

  • Twin‑engine, single aisle, short- to medium-range narrow-body
  • First Flight (base model) - 9April, 1967
  • Fuel Capacity - 10707Ga/40530L
  • Takeoff Runway Requirement - 8690ft/2648m
  • Range - 3550nmi/6570km
  • Seats - 210


Other variants - 737 MAX-7, 737 MAX-9, 737 MAX-10



Boeing 747-8:

  • Heavy, four‑engine, partial double deck, twin–aisle main deck, single–aisle upper deck, medium- to long-range widebody
  • First Flight (base model) - 9February, 1969
  • Fuel Capacity - 63094Ga/238836L
  • Takeoff Runway Requirement - 10450ft/3185m
  • Range - 7730nmi/14310km
  • Seats - 410
Other variants - 747-100SR, 747-200, 747-300, 747-400, 747-8



Boeing 777-300ER:

  • Heavy, twin-engine, twin aisle, medium- to long-range, ultra long-range, widebody
  • First Flight (base model) - 12June, 1994
  • Fuel Capacity -  45219Ga/171172L
  • Takeoff Runway Requirement - 10500ft/3200m
  • Range - 7,370nmi/13649km
  • Seats - 396
Other variants - 777-200LR




Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner:

  • Heavy, twin-engine, twin aisle, long-range widebody
  • First Flight (base model) - 15December, 2009
  • Fuel Capacity - 33528Ga/126917L
  • Takeoff Runway Requirement - 8530ft/2600m
  • Range - 7,305nmi/13530km
  • Seats - 248 
Other variants - 787-9 Dreamliner, 787-10 Dreamliner



For more information stay tuned to AVIATION BOY





SWISS AIR FLIGHT 111 INVESTIGATION

 WHAT BROUGHT DOWN SWISSAIR111

The Transportation Safety Board of Canada launches what will become the largest air disaster investigation in the nation's history. They only know that Swiss Air 111 experienced a cockpit fire, but what caused it remains a mystery. It would be a challenging task for the investigators to gather the remains of SWISSAIR111 from the ocean, the remain lie berried under water about 55meters(185feet). It was in a couple of 1,000,000 pieces, so that was the initial challenge and then after that. Of course, when you have so many pieces. You need to determine which are the relevant ones, and what are these pieces telling you about what happened and why? 

The search for the wreckage begins

The TSB embarks on a complex multi stage plan. First, divers are deployed to survey the wreckage. They discover that the plane is smashed into millions of pieces as far weather worsens the risk to divers increases. At this rate, the investigation will take years to complete. Stage 2 with help from the United States Navy Remote operated vehicles begin a more detailed search. The ROVs help investigators surveyed the site. But the question remains how to recover tiny pieces of twisted metal from the bottom of the sea? Out of the wreckage, the first breakthrough emerges. Swiss Air 111 black boxes, recordings of cockpit and computer data tell investigators that everything on the plane was working perfectly until the last few minutes.

The investigating team faces a setback when it is found that the last 6minutes of the flight data was not recorded on any of the flight data recorders. This made it clear that the fire had affected the crucial flight instruments and it was the cause of the black boxes not recording any data. With the failure of the black boxes, investigators are no closer to learning how or where the fire started on Swiss Air 111.  Stage 3 barges are deployed to scour the seabed for evidence. One by one, sad remnants of the airplane reached the surface. One of her engines, then the landing gear. These were among the largest pieces of Swiss air 111 to be recovered. The rest are mere fragments dredged up in a painfully slow process. Stage four and nearby military hanger provides a makeshift lab for the growing team of forensic investigators. Among them are representatives from the American NTSB, Boeing, Swiss Air and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. pieces of Swiss Air 111 arrive by the truckload. They are organized into various categories for analysis. Soon the hanger is stacked to capacity with the biggest jigsaw puzzle in the TSB's history. 


aviation meaning, boeing 737, pilot, aviators, air traffic control, air traffic control usa, air traffic control in the usa


How did a seemingly small cockpit fire suddenly turn to catastrophe? 

the team sorts through nearly 250 kilometers of wiring retrieved from the wreckage of Swiss air 111. Here, the first real clue evidence of fire caused by electrical arcing. Scorch marks on metal revealed that the source of the fire was in the back of the cockpit, directly behind First Officer Löw. An examination of the aircraft wiring plans leads investigators to a likely suspect. The entertainment system in first class. 

The system had some major deficiencies it was getting very hot it draw a lot of power. And thereby raising the cabin temperature considerably because it was always running. The manufacturers did not install a simple off switch, in order to install appropriate cooling. The TSB investigators finally think they have the breakthrough they've been seeking. 

When Captain Zimmerman, through the cabin bus switch all power to the cabin, should have been turned off, but the entertainment system remained on overheating. 

Swiss air immediately disables the entertainment system on the rest of its fleet. But the TSB concludes that the mystery is not solved. Investigators determined that the problem with the entertainment system alone could not have brought down Swiss air 111. The search for answers must continue. 

aviation meaning, boeing 737, pilot, aviators, air traffic control, air traffic control usa, air traffic control in the usa



Stage five the TSB decides to reconstruct the MD 11 from the wreckage. A wireframe mockup they call the jig provides a spine for placing tiny pieces back where they once belonged. The reconstruction reveals that the hidden fire spread from the cockpit back into the first class galleys. Some metal showed heat damage from temperatures as high as 1100 degrees Fahrenheit. As the investigation continues, some argue that the actions of the pilots may have contributed to the disaster. Some experts charge that Zimmerman and Löw's by the book approach may have cost them their lives. Unfortunately, in this case, the way the checklist was written. It didn't identify that now start towards the divert. It started more on let's try to see if we can solve the problem. But the TSB considers the timeline investigators determined that Swiss Air 111 would not have made Halifax airport under any circumstances. There just wasn't enough time. 

Whatever caused the fire on Swiss air, it happened at a lethal speed. The mystery lingers. Second year passes, then another ambitious operation begins. 

The TSB hires a sophisticated Dutch salvage ship queen of the Netherlands. The vessel is equipped with a gigantic vacuum system, capable of dredging even the tiniest pieces of Swiss air 111 from the ocean floor. A mixture of seawater, silt and aircraft are pumped into the ships central hold. This cargo is then pumped into a specially constructed reservoir onshore nearby. When the gushing water drains away, investigators find another million pieces of the aircraft. And one of them may hold the clue to what caused the catastrophic fire. The tedious sorting once again resumes and goes on for weeks. 

Finally, after 15 months, they find what they've been seeking one faulty wire.  Next to the wire that started the arc was an insulation blanket made of some highly flammable substance. The insulation blankets which line the MD 11 are common on commercial airlines worldwide. They have passed the industry flammability tests which require materials to self extinguish after a reasonable period of time. The investigation takes an abrupt turn. Instead of seeking the cause of the fire. The TSB now focuses on the flammable materials that fueled it.  

aviation meaning, boeing 737, pilot, aviators, air traffic control, air traffic control usa, air traffic control in the usa


Now they have their answer. A wire arced in a closed space behind the cockpit. The arc ignited the insulation, which in turn let other materials, such as foams. And plastics the pilots could not sense how quickly the fire intensified, but 14 minutes after they declared Pan Pan Pan the fire disabled all electronics in the cockpit, the black boxes went dead. Forensic examination also help shed light on the desperate final minutes in the cockpit. Löw was in his seat. Captain Zimmerman was not likely fighting the fire and probably dead before impact. 

At 10:30, Löw shut down engine two investigators determined that he likely received a warning that the engine was on fire. Chillingly it proved that low was alive a minute before impact. They could not determine whether the passengers were aware of the fire, at least until the very final moments. 

The aircraft hits the water with a force of 350 Gs.

The TSB spends 4 1/2 years and 40 million U.S. dollars. The largest air disaster investigation in Canada history. Their conclusion, is 1 powerful message. Flammable materials do not belong on commercial aircraft. 

In the aftermath of the disaster, Swiss Air decides to remove the flammable insulate from its entire fleet. They also make changes to checklist procedure, reducing response time in a cockpit smoke emergency. But plagued with financial problems, the mighty airline shocks the industry when it goes bankrupt in October 2001. Flammable insulation that sets Swiss air ablaze remains in 2/3 of commercial airlines today, but not for very much longer. 

The US Federal Aviation Administration had given a deadline of 2005 to remove the material from all commercial aircraft. This major overhaul aims to ensure the Swiss air tragedy will not be repeated. 

For more stories stay tuned to AVIATION BOY.

Tuesday 15 June 2021

SWISS AIR FLIGHT 111

 FIRE ON BOARD

1998 of Canada East Coast, a modern passenger jet run by one of the world's best airlines catches fire at 33,000 feet. In the final 6 minutes communications from the cockpit ceases. Then applying plummets into the ocean. 229 people are dead what caused the fire is a mystery.  Now after one of the largest investigations in aviation history, the complete story behind the loss of Swiss air flight 111 can finally be told. It's a wakeup call for the entire airline industry to ensure that what happened aboard Swiss air would never happen again.
Failure saves lives. In the airline industry, every time a plane crashes the probability of the next crash is lowered by that.

                                                                                                                            -George Carlin

MAYDAY! MAYDAY! MAYDAY!

September 2, 1998 Swiss air flight 111 prepares to depart from  New York  JFK International Airport on route to Geneva, Switzerland. The aircraft is McDonald Douglas 11 or MD 11 a model first developed in 1986 as a highly automated, modern improvement on the antiquated DC 10.

aviation meaning, aviation course, boeing 737, pilot, aviators, air traffic control, air traffic control in the usa, air traffic control in usa

It is considered one of the most reliable large passenger jets in the skies and Swiss air pilots are among the world 's best trained. Swiss air 111 pilots a captain Urs Zimmermann and first officer Stefan Löw. At the time of crash the captain had around 10,800 flying time under his belt, with approximately 900 hours in the MD-11.
The first officer also being experienced had 4,800 flying time under his belt and around 250 hours in the MD-11.
The flight crew were the veterans of the SWISS AIRFORCE. Zimmerman encourages an easygoing atmosphere in the cockpit but he is also known for his by the book precision when not flying he trains new pilots for Switzerland national airline. On board are 215 passengers 12 crew and the 2 pilots. Most passengers are French American or Swiss. 

As a standard operating procedure of the Swiss Air pilots pushed the throttles forward together, ensuring that no single pilot can bacha take off, this was done to ensure safety. Swiss air flight 111 lifts off the runway and makes her way northeast toward the Open Atlantic. For the first 15 minutes after takeoff. There is no communication from Swiss air 111. It is an unusual small detail that would later baffle investigators.

Atlantic air traffic is handled by a remote center in Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada.

Almost half an hour after takeoff captain Zimmerman makes his first communication with Moncton. The captain reported their altitude 33,000ft. The ATC acknowledged SwissAir111 to be on his radar. The ATC then cautioned the crew about facing some turbulence due to bad weather at all flight levels, so it was made clear that SwissAir111 would not climb or descend to avoid turbulence. It is a perfectly normal beginning to a transatlantic crossing.  In first class Swiss air passengers are among the first in the world to have a personalized in Flight Entertainment Network, though now common. The system is an innovation in 1998. Passengers can choose the own movie browse the Internet and gamble. 
This luxury would be the source of controversy to come. 

At this time the first officer smelt something and asked the captain if he also smelt the same. As per the protocol the captain took control over the aircraft and commanded the first officer to check for the cause of the smell. First officer Löw investigates the area near the air conditioner vent since harmless smoke traces from air conditioning systems are common on commercial jet. But he didn't find the cause of the smell. The smell was like the smell of smoke. And smoke in the jet meant fire on some part. The pilots confirmed with the cabin crew if they could smell smoke in the jet, but the smoke smell was just in the cockpit. So, the came to the conclusion that their Air Conditioner was at fault. But what the Crew could not see behind the sealed panels was getting bigger and bigger with every passing minute. 

aviation meaning, aviation course, boeing 737, pilot, aviators, air traffic control, air traffic control in the usa, air traffic control in usa

aviation meaning, aviation course, boeing 737, pilot, aviators, air traffic control, air traffic control in the usa, air traffic control in usa


Until now the Pilots could only smell the smoke, they closed the air conditioning ducts so the smoke disappeared. But less than 45 seconds before the smoke was gone it returned, and this time in more quantity. The Pilots could now see smoke in the cockpit. Zimmerman Falls, Swiss air procedure. He makes plans to divert the plane for the nearest place to land. Zimmerman radios air traffic control in Moncton, New Brunswick. He declares emergency  pan pan pan. Pan pan Pan is an international term used to notify air traffic control of an urgent situation. One step below declaring Mayday. He requests return to any of the nearest airfield to land the problematic aircraft preferably Boston. There were two ATCs in the control tower when the distress call was made from the SwissAir111, they recall that at the time when distress call was made the aircraft was about 66 nautical miles from Halifax airport and 300 nautical miles from Boston. But Zimmerman chose the airport he knew better. But when ATC told him that Halifax was closer to them they changed their plan and diverted to Halifax. The controller signs off with another aircraft. His jurisdiction is high altitude flights as Swiss air is on dissent to Halifax. He hands over responsibility to terminal controller. Zimmerman has two checklists for smoke in the cockpit to complete. Both will take 20 minutes. This is Swiss air company policy. In the meantime, Löw continues the descent into Halifax. For some reasons SwissAir111 was not descending as per requirement to make a safe landing. Captain Zimmerman needs information for the unfamiliar airfield, but his flight bag is out of reach. He summons the flight attendant to help. 

In the meantime the chief flight attendant notifies passengers that the flight is being diverted. There was no panic. The plane is flying normally and there is no sign of smoke in the cabin. So far, communications from Swiss air have been calm. Still, Moncton Center initiates emergency efforts at Halifax Airport. At this time the ATC asks the crew for the number of souls on board and amount of fuel left. The crew reported that they had 230tons of fuel remaining and they need to dump fuel. The ATC was taken aback to know this information so late. They were to be heading to the airport but now for dumping fuel they have to turn to flight heading 200 and be at 10 thousand feet. The ATC would notify the crew when they were on the ocean and can dump fuel. Then suddenly the lights in the cabin went off, but the crew requested the passengers to stay calm. Now the fire behind the sealed panels had reached the Autopilot computer. The other systems also started to fail one by one. In this situation the pilots wanted to aboard fuel dumping and just land but they were far from the airport and now the transmittion was also being distorted. The crew now declared a MAYDAY! and this was the last transmittion ever heard from SwissAir111.

SwissAir111 plumits out of the sky into the ocean. The following morning would be rescuers glimpse the terrible remains of Swiss air 111. Only one human body is discovered intact. All the 229 people on board had perished.

aviation meaning, aviation course, boeing 737, pilot, aviators, air traffic control, air traffic control in the usa, air traffic control in usa



The Transportation Safety Board of Canada launches what will become the largest air disaster investigation in the nation's history.  

aviation meaning, aviation course, boeing 737, pilot, aviators, air traffic control, air traffic control in the usa, air traffic control in usa



To know the reasons for this disaster stay tuned and follow AVIATION BOY

Sunday 13 June 2021

FAA Clash with Aviation Groups

 Training rules give rise to clash between FAA and Aviation Groups

The general aviation business is slamming the Federal Aviation Administration’s determination that flight instructors want exemptions to lawfully give flight coaching in some craft sorts.

In a letter dated 4 June, the government agency told business teams that rules veto instructors from providing coaching in “experimental”, “primary” and “limited” class craft. The letter aligned with associate degree April court ruling – one that some flight instructors aforementioned used “overly broad language” and would limit instruction amid high demand and a looming business pilot shortage.

Ten United States of America general aviation associate degreed pilot-interest teams blasted the regulator in an 8 June response to government agency administrator Steve Dickson.



”We write these days to urge the Federal Aviation Administration to right away revise, before of issue, the planned new flight coaching policies printed in a very 4 June, 2021 letter, that replicate unessential and unwarranted tips based mostly upon irrational legal positions,” says the the letter. ”If the government agency were to issue and implement these planned new policies, they're going to doubtless invite unessential legal battles whereas degrading safety.”

Executives from the craft homeowners and Pilots Association (AOPA), Experimental craft Association (EAA), General Aviation makers Association (GAMA) and National Business Aviation Association (NBAA) area unit among the letter’s signatories.

The FAA’s assessment, they say, may have “serious, negative implications on the broader flight coaching community” and creates extra confusion amongst instructors and homeowners seeking instruction in their own craft.


The case originated with a 2020 federal agency cease-and-desist order against Warbird Ventures, a Sunshine State company that trains pilots exploitation vintage world war II aircraft. federal agency laws outline such craft as “limited category”.

Warbird Ventures challenged the order in court, however the U.S.A. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia declined to review the matter in any condition.

The court’s ruling noted that laws disallow operation of “limited class civil craft carrying persons or property for compensation or hire”.

“A flight student could be a ‘person,’” the ruling says. “When a student is learning to fly in an aeroplane, the student is [carried]. And once the student is paying for the instruction, the student is being carried ’for compensation.’”

The flight-training industry’s concern stems from the last phrase – “the Trainee is being carried “for compensation’”. that's as a result of the federal agency has traditionally thought-about flight coaching as exempt from rules applying to industrial fights for compensation. The court’s formulation aforementioned flight coaching will truly involve carrying someone “for compensation”.

That spurred alarm among flight faculties and freelance instructors. They concern that, additionally to being qualified to teach, they'll would like totally different, extra certifications and medical licenses – probably a government officials, long and cost-prohibitive method. Flight instructors have aforementioned their livelihoods might be in danger if the federal agency maintains the court’s stance.

Earlier this year, AOPA aforementioned it absolutely was operating with the federal agency to clarify the which means of the court’s call. AOPA and 2 alternative general aviation groups sent the federal agency a letter on nineteen April seeking clarification.

In its four June response, the federal agency aforementioned limitations expressed within the ruling extends on the far side “limited class” craft to “experimental craft and first category aircraft”.

The federal agency defines “primary class aircraft” as having a “simple design” and being meant “exclusively for pleasure and private use”. they need to be unpressurised, seat no quite four individuals and might embrace craft, gliders, rotorcraft and manned balloons up to one,225kg (2,700lb) in weight. “Experimental craft” embody kit-built craft and aircraft meant for testing new region technologies and styles.

“[A] flight teacher providing flight coaching in one in every of these classes of craft for compensation is acting contrary to the laws absent a letter of deviation authority or exemption,” reads the letter, signed by the FAA’s Ali Bahrami, associate administrator for aviation safety.

US laws allow flight coaching in “standard class aircraft”, that area unit ”type-certificated within the traditional, utility, acrobatic, commuter, and transport categories”, federal agency documents say.

The agency says it'll publish any details regarding coaching within the alternative classes, however has not aforementioned once.

”The federal agency is considering ways in which to contour the method for owners of those craft to get flight coaching and can give additional data within the forthcoming policy statement,” Bahrami adds.

The court and federal agency have created “enormous confusion”, AOPA and alternative teams say in their letter. They urge the federal agency to issue a press release expression the agency “will not take legal social control action associated with the planned new policies to pilots and flight instructors till a satisfactory resolution has been reached”.

”By encouraging affected owners to get coaching in any ’standard class craft during which the pilot is rated,’ instead of the particular build and model aircraft the pilot are operative, federal agency is actively and effectively taking a stance to damage aviation safety,” the pilot teams add.




Thursday 10 June 2021

United Airlines Flight 811 Investigation

 NTSB INVESTIGATION CALLED

The most important part of any aircraft that had an incident is the BLACK BOX. Black Box is a set of two vital recording instruments "The Flight Data Recorder"(FDR) and "The Cockpit Voice Recorder"(CVR).
the FDR records all the flight data such as the pilot input to the computer and how/what did the aircraft responded to that input. The throttle, heading, altitude, flap setting, speed brake, torque on the engines, etc.
This can tell the investigators if the aircraft had any technical issues that brought it down. The CVR on the other hand records the voices in the cockpit. What was the condition of the Pilots flying, what were their actions at the time of catastrophe can be predicted by the CVR.



Usually in air crash investigation the body of the aircraft is not recovered completely, but in the case of United Flight 811 the complete aircraft was present for the investigators, all the three pilots were alive. This scenario might help the investigators to reach the conclusion easily.

It has to be noted that in part one of this crash blog I have mentioned that this is a personal story.
Amongst the nine passengers who blew away from the fuselage was a passenger Lee Campbell, son of Kevin and Susan Campbell. Lee was flying home in the United Flight 811 as an economy passenger. Kevin and Susan were at there home in New Zealand, when a phone call broke the news to them that their son was assumed to be dead in the accident.

Even knowing that Lee's body wouldn't be recovered the Campbell Couple decide to fly to the wrecked aircraft in Honolulu. The poor couple were helpless and decided to investigate the cause of the incident that separated them from their son, so that this never repeats.

OUTCOMES FROM NTSB INVESTIGATION

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) commenced associate investigation into the accident. An in depth air and surface search of the ocean, though, had at first didn't find the aircraft's door. Although they weren't able to examine the door, the NTSB proceeded with its investigation, and issued its final report on April 16th, 1990.

The NTSB looked to indirect evidencetogether with previous incidents that concerned merchandise doors. In 1987, Pan Am Flight a hundred twenty five, another Boeing 747, departing from London Heathrow field, encountered pressurization issues at 20 thousand feet (6,100 m), inflicting the crew to abort the flight and come back to the field. Once the safe landing, the aircraft's door was found to be open by concerning one.5 inches (3.8 cm) on its ventral edge. once the craft was examined during a maintenance construction, all of the protection arms were found to be either broken or entirely sheared off. Boeing at first attributed this to mishandling by gang. To check this concern, Boeing taught 747 operators to shut and lock the door with the external handle, so activate the door-open switch with the handle still within the secured position. Since the S-2 switch was designed to deactivate the door motors if the handle was secured, nothing ought to have happened. A number of the airlines reported the door motors did so begin running, making an attempt to force the door open against the protection sectors and inflicting injury to the mechanism.
Based on the proof obtainableand therefore the attribution of previous cargo-door malfunctions to wreck and crew mishandling, the NTSB operated from Associate in Nursing assumption that a properly bolted and latched 747 door couldn't open in flight:

        There aren't any affordable means that by that the door protection and latching mechanisms might open automatically on the wing from a properly closed and latched position. If the lock sectors were in correct condition, and were properly settled over the closed latch cams, the lock sectors had spare strength to stop the cams from moving to the open position throughout ground operation and flight. However, there are 2 potential means that by that the door might open whereas on the wing. Either, the latching mechanisms were forced open electrically through the lock sectors when the door was secured, or the door wasn't properly bolted and latched before departure. Then the door opened once the pressurization hundreds reached a degree that the latches couldn't hold. 


The NTSB learned that in N4713U's case, the craft had practiced intermittent malfunctions of its forward door within the months before the accident. Supported this data, the NTSB terminated in its April 1990 report that these malfunctions had broken the door protection mechanism in a very manner that caused the door to indicate a bolted and latched indication, while not being totally bolted and latched. So, the NTSB attributed the accident to human error by the bottom crew.[failed verification] supported this hypothesis of in-service injury, the NTSB conjointly faulted the airline for improper maintenance and scrutiny because of its failure to spot the broken protection mechanism. Specializing in injury to the door and maintenance procedures, the NTSB terminated that the accident was preventable human error, and not a retardant inherent within the style or operate of the aircraft's door.



CAMBELL'S INVESTIGATION

Lee Campbella new Zealander returning home, was one among the casualties on Flight 811. when his death, his oldsters Kevin and Susan Campbell investigated the cause victimization documents obtained from the NTSB. The Campbells' investigation led them to conclude that the reason behind the accident wasn't human error, however rather the mixture of associate degree electrical downside associate degreed an inadequate style of the aircraft's merchandise door-latching mechanism. They later bestowed their theory to the protection board.

The Boeing 747 was designed with associate degree outward-hinging door, in contrast to a plug door that opens inward and jams against its frame because the pressure drops outside, creating accidental gap at high altitude not possible. The outward-swinging door will increase the merchandise capabilityhowever needs a robust lockup mechanism to stay it closed. Deficiencies within the style of wide-body doors were better-known since the first Seventies from flaws within the DC-10 merchandise door. These issues weren't totally addressed by the craft business or the NTSB, despite the warnings and deaths from the DC-10 accidents and tries by Boeing to resolve the issues within the Seventies.




The 747's door used a series of electrically operated latch cams into that the door-edge latch pins closed. The cams then revolved into a closed position, holding the door closed. A series of formed arms (called lockup sectors) were motivated by the ultimate manual moving of a lever to shut the door; these were designed to bolster the unpowered latch cams and forestall them from rotating into associate degree unsecured position. The lockup sectors were created out of metaland that they were too skinny to be ready to keep the latch cams from entering into the unsecured position against the facility of the door motors. Electrical switches cut electric power to the door once the outer handle was closed; but, if one among those were faulty, the motors may still draw power and rotate the latch cam to the open position. constant event may happen if worn wires were ready to power the cam motor, albeit the circuit power was cut by the protection switch.

As early as 1975, Boeing complete that the metal lockup sectors were too skinny to be effective, and suggested the airlines to feature doublers to the lockup sectors. when the 1987 Pan Am incident, Boeing issued a service bulletin notifying operators to interchange the metal lockup sectors with steel lockup sectors, and to hold out numerous inspections. Within the US, the Federal Aviation Agency mandated this service by suggests that of associate degree soundness directive in July of 1988 and gave U.S. airlines eighteen to twenty four months to go with it. When the Flight 811 accident, the Federal Aviation Agency shortened the time to thirty days.

FINAL REPORT

On September 26 and October 1, 1990, 2 halves of Flight 811's door were recovered from the ocean from fourteen,100 feet (4,300 m) below the ocean surface. The door had broken lengthwise across the middle. Recovery crews reportable that no different rubbish or proof of human remains had been discovered. The NTSB inspected the door and determined that the condition of the protection mechanism failed to support its original conclusions.



Additionally, in 1991, an occurrence occurred at New York's John F. Kennedy International airport involving the malfunction of a United Airlines Boeing 747 door. At the time, United Airlines' service staff was investigation the reason for a circuit-breaker trip. within the method of identification the cause, an inadvertent operation of the electrical lock mechanism caused the door to open spontaneously despite being closed. An inspection of the door's electrical wiring discovered insulation breaches, and uninflected bound electrical wires allowed the door to work unremarkably once more. The lock sectors, latch cams, and latch pins on the door were inspected, and failed to show any signs of harm of the kind foretold by the NTSB's original hypothesis.

Based on developments after it issued its original report in April 1990, the NTSB issued a superseding accident report on March 18, 1992. In this report, the NTSB determined that the evidence of the accident was the sudden opening of the door , which was attributed to improper wiring and deficiencies within the door's design. It appeared during this case that a brief circuit caused an unordered rotation of the latch cams, which forced the weak locking sectors to distort and permit the rotation, thus enabling the pressure differential and aerodynamic forces to blow the door off the fuselage; ripping away the hinge fixing structure, the cabin floor, and therefore the side fuselage skin; and causing the explosive decompression.


For more stories on air crash stay tuned and follow AVIATION BOY